One more for BlogDay
The Onion
to my list...it's great in so many ways...
Tag: BlogDay2005
And here is a comprehensive list [via Hugh Hewitt] of Katrina related links.
The way I am thinking of this is that Ojos solves the long tail problem with my thousands of unnamed, untagged photos. Sure, I put the occasional picture up on flickr and buzznet and go to the trouble of tagging them, but the vast majority are simply filed away on my hard drive under a general topic and month the picture was taken. This could fix that.I originally started chatting with Michael before I moved to the area when he saw that I point to his reviews frequently. He got me involved in the amazing Pandora alpha (love it) and is a self-proclaimed 'blog whore' (love that, too). I think it was Dave Winer who originally got me hooked on his great reviews.
For no other reason than this particular archive page gets oodles of hits and I was a dumbass for every typing it.
Try this on for size: I think there’s no such thing as an objective blogger. Or you’re probably not blogging. You’re probably not talking with people, eye to eye. We’re about to kill the myth that journalists can be thoroughly objective; let’s not start trying to accrete that artificial ethic to blogs. I say that opinion is the proxy for transparency and it also makes a relationship more compelling: Agree or disagree with him, you knew where former NY Times Public Editor Dan Okrent stood and he made an interesting read; the current Timesman, the more balanced and traditional Byron Calame, is as dull as limestone.Funny thing is that after I had this conversation with my husband at the beginning of last week, he totally 'got it' (even being a neo-luddite). Bless his soul, he was overheard on every conversation at our wedding reception chatting away on how the blogosphere is going to change journalism as we know it. He even chatted about it with my good friend, Tanya Enberg, Senior Editor of 24 Hours, who immediately came up to me, wide-eyed and asked if she needed to start a blog.

Silicon is the principal component of glass, cement, ceramics, most semiconductor devices, and silicones, the latter a plastic substance often confused with silicon.Now, Silicon in it's most frequently used form would be totally uncomfortable to the implant wearer and enjoyer, but when you add Oxygen and some other stuff, all sorts of great things happen! Geez, it even points out on the SiliconE page that Shakira, another out-of-towner, makes the reverse mispronounciation.
[disclaimer: if any of this sounds incoherent, I'm flying high on flu medication right now, so bear with me]
I'm in California, in my new office - which is abuzz with activity. It's pretty brilliant to walk these guys work together.Hey Chris,
Of COURSE you aren't evil. (And, yes, I am seriously prone to hyperbole.) I just don't agree with not giving press passes to well-read bloggers (sure, you have to draw the line) who also write for online zines. Maybe I'm too quick to write off traditional media, but I'm constantly impressed by the power of the blogosphere. The permanence of the entries (without being locked behind subscription walls) also make for good ongoing online marketing efforts.
If B.L. were to write a series of great posts on the proceedings, others would read it, link to it and the word would spread that BlogOn is the conference to be at. If a newspaper covers the story, they will (most likely) still be talking about blogging like it's new and a trend and some people may read it with interest, but very few will pass that information along.
When I say 'evil', you are right - I don't know enough about the conference to make that assessment (even if by 'evil', I mean I'm suspicious of the intent). I'm just skeptical about a blogging conference that hire traditional PR and (it seems) brush off the real clout behind the subject matter - bloggers themselves.
But, perhaps your audience isn't the blogosphere. Perhaps your audience is corporate america and spreading the word offline. That's a great cause in itself.
The location is great, though. I did write a post about that earlier. And your speakers/moderators? Fabulous.
I wish you the best and I hope to read all about it (online).
Tara
And I think that BlogOn will be a right on time - but mostly for the intended audience: corporate dudes who need to get their brains around this blogging thing. The hard core bloggers should stick to Bar Camp and BloggerCon. (but I'm sure they are welcome nonetheless)I agree, Tara: the power of the blogosphere is awesome, and we (at Guidewire Group and the DEMO Conference) have been working to leverage that power -- and authority. But, to borrow from Monty Python, traditional media is "not dead yet." And it still holds tremendous sway with the corporate communications people for whom blogging IS a new thing.
The remarkable bit of data lost in the whole "BL didn't get a press pass" bit is that BL WAS invited to become a BlogOn Evangelist, complete with a comp ticket to the conference. She turned us down.
We absolutely believe that bloggers such as BL and others ought to be a part of this discussion. But it IS a different discussion now from the ones that occur among bloggers themselves. And it requires a different approach to reach these new conversants. THAT'S WHY we need to use traditional channels and techniques -- because those work with this audience.
You are right, our addience isn't the blogosphere, it's corporate America. I appreciate that you see our intent as "a great cause."
Good luck, Chris! You're working on a very tough audience - it's like stepping into the Twilight Zone where everyone has been asleep for the past 20 years! ;)
We NEED people advocating offline...

...being HorsePigCow'd?Ever since we started the Music Genome Project, our friends would ask:
Can you help me discover more music that I'll like?
Those questions often evolved into great conversations. Each friend told us their favorite artists and songs, explored the music we suggested, gave us feedback, and we in turn made new suggestions. Everybody started joking that we were now their personal DJs.
We created Pandora so that we can have that same kind of conversation with you.
Musical analysis? Wow. I'm all over that one. What's next? Bring it on!
In Canada, we have this huge fashion discount retail chain called Winners. It's a terrible name for a place where you can find some really nice stuff.
Seth Godin has collaborated with some uber impressive names in business to bring you 'The Big Moo' and is spreading the word: he needs YOU and I to help HIM spread the word. Great idea, huh?
Driving into Quebec I noticed signs advising motorists that radar detectors are prohibited. I can honestly say I don't know anyone who owns a radar detector, but most of them probably speed.
[via a gazillion bloggers - but it was first brought to my attention via Steve Rubel]
I read a particularly poignant passage the other day at Clickz....Perhaps we'd all be well served by dusting off Garrett Harden's famous treatise, "The Tragedy of the Commons." It teaches us about the fundamental conflict between individual interests and the common good. Hardin talks of a plot of land used by all livestock farmers in a village. Each farmer keeps adding more livestock to the common, lured by the fact it costs him nothing to do so. Meanwhile, he's blinded to the painful reality of overgrazing and depletion.

Is this the Tipping Point?
http://donaldtrump.trumpuniversity.com/default.asp?item=93588
[via: Steve Rubel]
Some of us are fortunate enough to work for ourselves or companies with
vision. Some of us are still pretty fortunate because we work with
companies that trust us to give them vision, even if they don't always
take our advice. Then there are the poor saps among us that work for
companies that haven't caught up to the new-fangled business philosophies
called...um...trust and...um...employee empowerment...and...um...the
customer.
You may think that's a recipe for disaster. And it is. In fact, it's a
slowly dug grave, but it's being dug nonetheless. These companies fire
their innovators because they 'rock the boat' and keep the 'yes-men'
because they are 'on track'. On track to what, preytell?! Your own
funeral?
Just imagine for a second that you work at that company. What do you do?
Do you quit? What if you have a family at home and you are the sole
breadwinner? You have very little savings to fall back on. They've beaten
you down so much over the years that you don't believe your talents
saleable. Yet, you have ideas. You have passion. They haven't snuffed
that. Something in you still burns. You find refuge volunteering, writing,
blogging, networking...maybe even just dreaming. You've written 25+ well
thought-out proposals over the year that would save your company oodles of
dollars and/or provided unbeatable advantages for customers to use your
service vs. another on...but you continually get the pat on the head and
your proposal gets filed under 'trash'.
And then the day comes when they decide to shake up the organization.
Something needs to change. And, somehow, the people patting you on the
head get to stay and you get let go. And you walk away thinking, "If
that's change, I don't want anything to do with it."
Don't ever let them tell you that layoffs and organizational change is
always getting rid of the deadwood. Remember, deadwood floats.
Whilst sweating on the treadmill late this afternoon, one of the many
television screens laid out before me showed an ad for a robot sort of
dusting floor thing that rolls around so you don't have to worry about
sweeping ever again. Interesting enough.
I might have even been tempted to buy one, but all of a sudden, they
flashed in the corner of the screen, "This is a Word of Mouth product! It
will go fast!"
So, infomercials have co-opted WOM now? It made me feel dirty.

Measurements
Content Management/Online Merchandising
New Technology Research/Integration
I have 6+ years of work experience in marketing, online marketing and project management. I have been designing websites and working onlinesince 1993. I have a great passion for everything online and I am aCluetrain Manifesto evangelist.
I'm looking for an Online Marketing position with an online marketing agency or a company/association dedicated to their online presence [read:passion for online]. I have been working in middle management for the past two years and am looking for a similar level with the chance to grow intoa more senior role.
Thanks, in advance...xo
I know. My articles sound like yawnsville, but I'm really very proud of my contributions. Ken has built a nice blog e-zine over there that is very much worth a read. I think I'm going to discuss folksonomies next week!
Nothing today, though, and unless at some point between now and midnight I get a burst of creative energy, it's not going to happen. I refuse to force it. It will just turn out badly.
Thanks again Fast Company and Heath! I had fun!
[you should really just go and read the plethora of entries under the BlogJam2005 category - there were some really amazing ones!]
...The Paradox of Choice, a brilliant book by Barry Schwartz. If you haven't read it, you really have to. As Americans, we assume that more choice means better options and greaterNext Book: I've been recommended "Everything Bad is Good for You" by Steven Johnson, who has a blog.
satisfaction. But beware of excessive choice: choice overload can make you
question the decisions you make before you even make them, it can set you up for
unrealistically high expectations, and it can make you blame yourself for any
and all failures. In the long run, this can lead to decision-making paralysis.
And in a culture that tells us that there is no excuse for falling short of
perfection when your options are limitless, too much choice can lead to clinical
depression.
[originally posted here for BlogJam 2006 at the Fast Company blog]
Now that Steve Rubel and Jeff Jarvis have started something, I think it might be fun to play along and start a couple of Top 10 tags of our own for Technorati. It really demonstrates to me the power of social networks when I see these lists grow...
I always like to think of what I would do if money wasn't an issue, so here is my 10 tag -- 10dreams -- the first ten things I would do if I won a big, fat lottery:
Anyone want to join in? 10dreams
[because I can't let this argument go]There are probably many other ways to use social media for local business and the same way you apply 'Markets are Conversations' online, you can apply it offline. Word of mouth has been around forever, but it's more powerful than it has ever been...and it's only going to get stronger.
I catch myself walking down a crowded street, searching the faces of the people, wondering which of them know what social networks are, if they've ever used one or where they are at with the whole 'Power of Us' culture.
We're all so different. So unique. We all consume for our own reasons, based on our own experiences...but social networks are almost always present at some stage of the transaction.
I had a near-yelling debate with a friend of mine last night (both of us had too much to drink) where her and I were speaking entirely different languages. If you asked both of us separately what we were discussing, you would end up hearing two versions of the conversation that didn't seem congruent at all. The strange thing is, though, we kept arguing.
Where it stemmed from was that a student was staying with her neighbour who was working on his Ph.D. in Mass Media. He and I connected strongly because I basically live what he studies. The conversation with him got me quite excited and all of a sudden, I was on the runaway 'Cluetrain'. This would be fine, but I had spent the day drinking in the sun and was tipsy and tired and scrappy.
So, when my girlfriend started questionning the Cluetrain logic, I sputtered a bit. But here's the thing, I don't know if she was really challenging what I was saying at all. She came from a position of not being an online person, never having read the Cluetrain and starting her own business (neighbourhood video store). In fact, she's already used collaborative social networks in her early phases of starting her own business. She sent an email out to her list of friends asking for their 'top 50 movies of all time' (theres another tag...) to help her with her collection for the store. The difference came when she defined this email as 'target marketing to a specific demographic' and I was defining it as 'collaborating with her social network'.
I, personally, never like to think of my friends as a target market. Certainly, they may seem to fit a certain demographic. They are generally urban, 30-45, and middle income. But rather than picking my friends because they fit in a demographic (I certainly don't meet someone and think, "Gee, this person fits into my demographic profile of who I would like to hang out with"), it's because we share common interests. And that is where many of my friends differ. I have feminist friends, partying friends, online geek friends, arts and culture friends, work friends, funk/club culture friends, jazz friends, old friends, fashion friends, friends through Ken friends, queen street friends, etc. etc. And some of these friends have many various cross interests with me (i.e. many of my partying friends are also club culture friends).
[Nor could I rely on my email list of friends exclusively to actually build a business. I tend to find it easier to charge acquaintences than I do friends. I'm a generous friend. If I built a business on my friends alone, I would go broke.]
Friendships and interests are more akin to folksonomies and tagging than they are to demographics and psychographics. What's happening online is just an extension of how we sort our own lives offline. Back to Jay (and thanks for clarifying on that other post), we have very individual ways of sorting what we understand to be the world, our lives, our likes and dislikes, our observations, our theories, our beliefs, etc. We also are influenced by the ways our friends sort these things, and what I'm finding more and more is that tagging can both be an individual thing and a network thing. In order to connect with others, we find similar classifications or tags (i.e. doyourworst, 10blogs, 10shows, etc.). Sometimes these two versions of tagging crossover, sometimes they don't.
This doesn't render demographics or psychographics null, it just means that demo and psycho-graphics become another social network classification. And these types of classifications are both based on interests and not based on interests. Confused? So am I. I just don't believe that that demographics and psychographics are very personal. Tagging gets closer to being personal and it more closely aligns to what happens offline when we organize our own lives.
Now...back to the long tail. Folksonomies aren't new, but they certainly aren't widely known (or, more likely, widely recognized) beyond the confines of our online networks (and the people who study them). This means, to me, that as the word spreads and as more people get 'hip' to the terminology, folksonomies will take on new meaning and uses to many other people. Perhaps my girlfriend will reframe her own marketing strategies for her business in the years to come. Then we can have these discussions in the same language.
The long tail of the Cluetrain may be longer than any of us can ever imagine...I wonder what it will look like at the end of it?

Okay, so it's juvenile (according to Ken, who had no problem participating), but I've made my mark in Flickr's 'doyourworst' tag.
More fun with technorati tags from Jeff Jarvis (via Steve Rubel)...I'm putting my Canadian spin on them:There are oodles more I can think of...any of my Canadian readers want to throw a few names out?
Just listening to Paco Underhill's 'Why We Buy: The Science of Shopping' and he makes a very astute remark about how online retailers can learn from old skool catalogue shopping...
THE MEETING
Synopsis...The Meeting is an interactive, multi-media corporate fantasia set in a boardroom at fictional interactive marketing agency SideCar. Part survival-guide for the corporate meeting hound, part interactive bullshit-bingo playing experience for the audience, The Meeting provides a context for the playing out of petty jealousies, neuroses, insecurities and ambitions of the attendees.
The play itself is a combination of live theatre (ritualized corporate narrative) and a multi-media presentation focusing on the inner monologues, dialogues and random pieces of pop music that are part of the interior life of anyone who has ever attended a meeting. People just like you, man. Just like you. But funnier.
SHOWTIMES for THE MEETING
SAT Aug 6 3:00pm
SUN Aug 7 9:00pm
THU Aug 11 10:30pm
SAT Aug 13 6:00pm
SUN Aug 14 12 noon
VENUE
At the Factory Studio Theatre125 Bathurst Street (at Adelaide)
directions & map
TICKETS
Tickets are $10, cash only, and are on sale daily at the venue, one hour before the first show of the day. No Latecomers!
I mean, really. Lots of people want to make fun of it lately. Haven't these same people heard of Wonkette? Boing Boing? Instapundit? Dooce? Joho? I hardly think I'm out of line...
I was taking my usual trip from [aggregated] gapingvoid post to [link #1] Paradox1x [reading reading reading] [click read back] [click read back] [click read back]BLOG:CMS is the most complete, feature-packed, personal publishing system on the market, developed by Radek Hulán. It includes state-of-the-art weblog, forum, wiki engine, news aggregator (atom / rss), and photo gallery.If it does everything I think it does, I'll have died and gone to heaven! It's Czech origin from what I can gather...so it's gotta be great! (Prague is one of my favourite cities)
Since I bought my iPod, I've listened to 20 books, oodles of spoken word/speeches, even more podcasts and hundreds of songs. It's just become so convenient to download a book I've been dying to read, hit play and go. I listen to books while working out, shopping, walking from destination to destination, riding the streetcar and subway, eating lunch, eating dinner, sitting in the park, lazing around, compiling stats, running errands...you name it, I'm listening and learning.
Yep...my sleepy little blog is being read by really prolific blogging giants (A-lister would be politically incorrect, but there has to be a kudos for being uber popular in the blogosphere and these bloggers are).Okay, so maybe the delineations between seniority and peon-ity (where I am now as a middle manager) aren't all they are cracked up to be (the money is a good incentive, though), but there are oodles of advantages to having more traffic here. The biggest being that the conversation that I yabber about constantly will actually happen here.
And, like Charlene Li says regarding A-lists, "If we don't care, we can't make a difference" and "will give (us) an opportunity to rise in (our) own specific areas".
Yep. We are truly " writing ourselves into existence on the web one entry at a time." (David Weinberger)
Thanks Steve and Doc for helping me by pinging my existence!
The problem with getting attention is that it becomes a double edged sword. Bloggers show up in the news, blogging becomes a newsworthy item in general, then the nay-sayers come out in flocks.There were critics when 'Talkies' took to the silver screen. There were critics of television of CDs of the internet in general. There will always be critics. There will be failures. There will be crazy revolutionaries that speak in odd languages we don't understand, so they scare the hell out of us, but then their predictions come true. I have a pretty good feeling about this one, though.
The blogosphere is here to stay and it's only going to get stronger.
My good friend, Lex, over at Cheapeats Toronto, pointed me to this new 'Blog Makeover' online series that is going on.Hon. mentions go to: Twist Image Insights, Freakonomics, Cheapeats Toronto Blog (to know what great food and/or cultural festival is going down while I'm gone), Church of the Customer, and Rick Mercer's blog.
There are tonnes of good blogs out there and I have oodles of them in my RSS aggregator. These are the ones that make my heart skip a little when I see a new post appear. I actually hate the rating system because I know I'm missing out on reading brilliant blogs out there that don't have oodles of followers and not all blogs have consistently amazing posts.
Have you ever tried to follow the Atkins diet? If you have, you'll know how desperately hard it is to follow their regime.
[image courtesy of Flickr's 'doyourworst' tag]There are alot of people (business people) who need to catch up. Seriously.So, technology and ideas are forging ahead, but it's leaving loads of companies and people too far behind in the dust...beyond the dust, actually. So far ahead, that ideas from 5 years ago are just starting to be noticed (kinda).


Yep. You read it right. Tucows had their meetup this eve in Toronto and Dave Winer presented OPML (Outline Processor Markup Language) - a really amazing program that will revolutionize how we collaborate with workteams, within the office and via remote (combines wiki principles, blogging outputs, RSS-type aggregates in IM-type real time - it's both none of those things but all of those things...I think I have it right...Dave?).So, there I was after an excellent discussion on what OPML is and it's potential applications (btw, Dave put the call out for any Linux savvy programmer to develop OPML for Linux - as it is only available for Windows and Mac) mucky-mucking with the Winermeister himself. 11 of us had a lovely dinner and (soon to be posted) podcasted discussion at The Liberty and the entire experience was invigorating and magical. I pitched my 'cookout' idea to Dave, who would love to do a large meeting of the minds in Toronto (I won't call it a conference 'cause it's antiquated). How very scintillating!
As soon as I have the link to the podcast and the other mentions, I will post them here.
Thanks Joey for putting up the notice, thanks Tucows for hosting it and thanks Dave for an entirely enchanting evening!

Speaking of women's events, this one is being put on by the amazing Helen Goldstein, so the event won't only be a wonderful night to sip and spa, but also network! Helen is one of the most connected women I know.
Here are the details:
Wednesday, August 17th, 2005 7-11 pm
C-Lounge 456 Wellington St W, Toronto
Indulge in two 15-minute complimentary sessions: choose from shiatsu, foot & hand massage, Reiki, non-invasive face-lifts (I've been told these are da bomb), intuitive readings, crystal healings, tarot, astrological readings and more!
Experience channeling with medium Natarsha Douglas. Manifest your intentions with Helen Goldstein. Shop at our one-of-a-kind boutiques (including some amazing vintage pieces from Holt Renfrew at serious discounts). Nourish yourself with delectable hors d'oeuvres & desserts. Take home gift bags (with YSL, Creme de la Mer, Axis Spa, etc. - valued at over $100).
Only 108 tickets available - $108.00 each.
Call 416.322.9936 x. 0 or visit http://www.yogastudio.net.
Part of the proceeds will be donated to Feed the Trees Foundation.
Oh...and the guys can come join the goddesses after 10:30 pm once we are relaxed and channeled and pampered for the after-party that will go to the wee hours.In the U.S "women more likely to text than men",this article says."Consumers aged between 15 and 24 years are the wave of the future for mobile marketing strategies using text messaging and internet on mobile phones.However (more surprisingly)young women are more likely than their male counterparts to use a computer and more likely to own a mobile phone and use it for text messaging.Mobile phones,MP3 players and hand-held computer devices continue to threaten the traditional hold of the clothing industry on spending in the youth market".This "youth market has a spending power of USD485 billion", Packaged Facts estimates.Hello?! Are you listening?!
As per Doc Searls' post yesterday on gender balance, I concur with Red Barren. I wish I was at Blogher. It sounds amazing.But most of all, I'm disgusted with myself. I'm a product of everything I work against every day. It is still difficult as a woman with very feminine traits to get ahead these days. Really. If you are a woman who plays by 'men's rules' and values and embodies male traits, you can get way further. Those of us who value emotion, connections, feelings, empathy, etc. are often dismissed outright. If it ain't about making a buck and being 100% accountable for it, it ain't business...
I've been working amongst a majority of women for years, so I have been allowed to blossom and encouraged in my creativity. I find conversations with many male executive types very frustrating. I can usually articulate exactly where we are experience a chasm in our conversation, but I still get blank looks. Nope. I don't agree. Money isn't 'the bottom line' for me. The money will come when you take care of 'the bottom line', which means human beings in my eyes.
But what I find interesting is that when guys like Seth Godin, Tom Peters and Doc Searls speak for women, people listen. Male leaders. Don't get me wrong, I love it and I hope they speak more. It's incredibly important for the future of women in business. I just observe that their voices are heard as rational and ours as whining or worse.

Last week's discussion with Kryptonite as well as the drama that unfolded over at The Accordion Guy's blog on Quick Boys Movers have made this an amazing week for 'The Power of Us' in the blogosphere.
Sure, we can't ever abuse that power or believe that, individually, we can really truly accomplish anything major (then we'd become alot like who we are criticising). (Neither are 'we' ever a collective 'we') However, it will only be a matter of time before the conversation becomes the central thesis and hierarchies are broken down.
As the blogosphere grows, I can only imagine that the power of the voices within it will, too. I wrote a piece about it over at OneDegree.ca that should be coming out in a day or two.
Oh...and it won't be long before I help AIMS Canada get their blog up and running. I had a great meeting with Dave F. over there and pushed all of my opinions on him. He's biting on the blog. I'll keep working on him with the other stuff.
Whoah...what's going on here and here?