There has been a great deal of talk on Twitter lately about redesigning Zappos.com and if I weren’t a frequent online shopper of shoes and clothes, I may have to agree with people. Yeah, the design isn’t the prettiest I’ve seen. In fact, there are plenty of more aesthetically pleasing fashion sites out there. However, in the defense of Zappos and in my experience of shopping there (quite frequently, I’m afraid to admit) even BEFORE the fancier new Zeta product, I want to let you in on why I think the design is almost perfect.
- Zappos understands shoe buyers needs. I have wider calves. I could say it was because of ten years of figure skating, but taking a look at the women in my family, I’m pretty sure it’s just the way our bodies are built. Pre-Zappos, I would search around online and off for boots that would actually fit my calves properly. This was an embarrassing and frequently disheartening process. I’d find boots I love, but couldn’t zip up and the boots that would zip up would be clunky and ugly. Not at Zappos! They let me filter my results to look at wide calf designed boots only…and there are some beauties in there! They also give me filters like heel height and casual vs dressy. Reading through the comments, I know that I’m not alone…
- Zappos posts real comments – good and bad. The first time I left a comment about some boots I sent back, I noticed it was held for moderation. I worried that this was because they may not want to actually post comments that were negative. Not so. It turns out that they want to make sure the comments would be truly helpful (and honest – not planted by a company representative or a competitor) for future Zappos customers’ shopping experience. I find that sometimes on Amazon, the commenters aren’t so helpful to my decision. Something in the way Zappos crafts comments makes me really sure about my purchases. Oh…and their new reporting on the overall comments is way useful:

- Zappos makes it über simple to return. Knowing that they are selling shoes, which are very difficult to shop for, they’ve built in a way to make it super simple to return them. Right after purchase, they give you the actual link to the printable UPS label. They also give you this same link in your confirmation email and the packaging of the shoes themselves. There is no searching around. They get it.
- Zappos has a crazy selection that gives accurate filters. I can browse everything, which is good for discovery, or I can quickly find that perfect thing I’m looking for. They have a crazy huge selection, which can be daunting, but make it really simple to narrow it down. I don’t think I’ve ever wished for another category, yet their categories don’t seem overly extensive. It’s like they are inside my head. I like that.
- Zappos puts their customer service number on EVERY page. That may seem obvious, but it is rare. I usually have to search around for a way to talk to a person directly. At Zappos, there is no confusion nor is there confusion when I call the actual number. It takes me little time to talk to a human being. The irony of this? I’ve rarely actually had to use this feature.
- Zappos warns me if I need to stop waffling and make the purchase already. Also a good sales technique, but I’ve been disappointed before when I’ve put something in my cart, waited a few days and found out that I missed the boat.
- On Zappos, it’s not about how great they are. It’s all about me! Sure, Zappos could make it more obvious how much their customers love them, but I don’t think they are trying to hide that fact. I think they are just demonstrating that Zappos focuses on helping their customers rock, not telling the world how fabulous they are…which is why they ARE fabulous. A site needs to help me find what I need to find. Period. Let me figure the awesome part out for myself.
Much like Craigslist, the features Zappos makes easy to find are the ones that matter to me and those that they are missing (or are more difficult to access) aren’t that big of deal. And I’ve been a pretty hefty user of online shopping sites.
So…Zappos…if you do decide to redesign and prettify, taking the advice of others, please remember that my experience as a customer is pretty much perfect, which is why I always go to you first when shopping for almost anything these days. But you already know that. I know you do.





I think Zappos.com has been struggling with usability vs. culture for some time now. At least, I believe Brian Kalma made that statement in an UIE interview.
There is a learning curve for those that are not as tech-savvy. But, for those willing to push through the growing pains, it becomes an old favorite. Like a nicely-worn, leather Brooks bicycle saddle.
Here’s the SpoolCast: http://bit.ly/tnh0c
@Andy Thanks! I’ll definitely take a listen! I wonder if Craig Newmark and Tony Hsieh have talked about that struggle? Both sites get designers up in arms, but have huge fans.
It’s funny you should mention this: I’ve been thinking about this issue for ages, and only recently blogged about it (here: http://www.planet-anarky.co.uk/index.php/2009/07/27/zappos-design/)
I hear what you’re saying about the good points of Zappos…but I gotta say I agree with Andrew Wilkinson’s open letter.
I really liked Andrews letter too, and he was basically pointing the finger at me
BUT, it spawned a lot of useful chatter. He is but one of many folks who have written a post like that. Much of what was said was true, but many simple points were missed. I’d LOVE the opportunity to post a response to his note, but oddly enough he does not allow comments
I’ve tweeted out asking to post a reply to his post but no dice! Anyone know him?
Brian, may I just also say “Good on you” for responding publically too. It’s all too easy for bloggers like me to criticise someone’s work, but getting engaged as you are is great.
I posted a response to Andrew’s letter on Zappos Blogs: http://tinyurl.com/rcrz3o
More retail sites should just make all the data accessible via API and let other people design the UI, a la the Twitter model.
Craigslist should absolutely take this strategy.