3/20/2006

Marx is back...get used to it

[Am I allowed to say that in this country? Darn. I am probably going to be red flagged or something...damn]

After a very lively Berkely Cybersalon yesterday afternoon, I started researching elitism versus the voice of the commons and I happened upon something I haven't read since second year university, The Communist Manifesto.

Okay...okay...scary territory for some of my American readers. Being Canadian, you have to understand, means that I wasn't raised in an education system that looked down on socialism or communism. In fact, Canada is considered a socialist state with our universal health care, higher taxes (although to tell you the truth, I pay as much if not more in California for a whole lot less), strong social system and less forgiving policies on big business. Sure, even Canada is moving more in a capitalist direction, but in school, I learnt that communism is just another type of government: one based in the commons with less centralized power.

So, when I read Andrew Keen's article entitled, Web 2.o is Reminiscent of Marx, I instantly thought of it as a complimentary piece. I was surprised to read that it is anything but. Apparently, Keen doesn't think much of Marx.

Alright, alright...so yes...many of the people behind the movement are oozing with priviledge and 'elitism'. A cute term for this emerged a couple of years back in Toronto. We were called 'BoBos' or The Bourgeoise Bohemians...yes. We are free to throw our utopic philosophies askew, crying for a better world into our crystal champagne glasses, blogging on our brand new MacBook Pros. Wah. Yes. That's icky.

[and for the record, I'm hardly wealthy or powerful, but I have a crazy amount of priviledge that allows me to rant and bark and spew right here right now]

But re-reading the CM, I was, once again, swept up in the following passage:
When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organized power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organize itself as a class; if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.

In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.
To sum it up in todays terms, under marxist communism THE COMMONS WILL OWN THE MEANS OF PRODUCTION AND WILL CALL THE SHOTS. I don't know about you, but that sounds pretty rockin' to me. But then again, I have faith in human beings.

Egad, experts are human, too. Suroweicki's Wisdom of Crowds gives oodles of accounts of expertise falling down. From his website:
Experts, no matter how smart, only have limited amounts of information. They also, like all of us, have biases. It's very rare that one person can know more than a large group of people, and almost never does that same person know more about a whole series of questions.
So, too, the elite? I say a big, fat YES.

Things are changing. Yeah, maybe the growth is currently isolated to small, but loud communities, but it won't take long before we start to see other communities empowered by the same thought. There WILL be a critical mass and ivory towers WILL fall.

UPDATE: My PiC has an additional rant that came out of last night's experience. Sigh, we are so dangerous together. ;)

[photo credit: speerfish of a t-shirt made by a very commie company, Threadless]

11 Comments:

Kevin Marks said...

Tara, citing the Communist Manifesto's rhetoric is one thing, using several of the biggest mass murderers in the history of humanity as graphical elements is quite another.
I wonder why you left Hitler out of the graphic?

3/20/2006 06:22:26 PM  
db said...

I agree with you assessment. I think that the sooner the US grasps the concepts of socialism and quits treating it like a dirty word we will all be better off. It reminds me of just recently when we went to Key West and my grandmother actually seemed scared that we would be only "90 miles from Cuba" whereas Ayse was looking to rent a boat and head in that direction. Also, I admire that you have come to the US in these times. It seems we have spent many a day these last few years filling out forms trying to immigrate to Canada. A trip to Toronto for Ayse's birthday almost sealed the deal. Anyway, it gives me hope when I know of someone coming in the other direction.

3/20/2006 06:22:52 PM  
miss rogue said...

A. I didn't create the graphic, it's from a very popular Threadless shirt. (which is beside the point)

B. Because Hitler wasn't a socialist.

History is interpreted through heavily influenced lenses, Kevin. Many countries believe that the US has been run by murderers as well. I don't think there is a single leader in history that doesn't have blood on their hands.

I suppose the image could be interpreted as taking away from my core message, but, being a Threadless shirt, I believe illustrates the future very nicely.

Thanks for your feedback.

3/20/2006 06:27:48 PM  
spcoon said...

good luck making anymore out-of-state conferences. you're on the no-fly list for sure now. ;)

3/20/2006 06:43:00 PM  
Bernard said...

Communist Manifesto is a good theory, but having it in practice is a different story. Just ask any Eastern European, we have first hand experience. Even though the crowds may posses the "Means of Production", "The shots" are called by an elite of worst kind-POLITICAL, if you ad to that that you have no FREE ELECTIONS....I don't think you would like the communism. Just for closing there is a big distinction between modern day socialism and Communism.

3/21/2006 05:20:04 AM  
Anonymous said...

Low score for canadian education. Communist goverment as less centralized? You've got to be kidding.

3/21/2006 07:17:34 AM  
polysciwiz said...

Communism is a flawed system of government.

1.) There is no incentive for the workers of the country to produce for the good of other people since they receive no pay for their work.

2.) In order for a communist society to work there must be a strong capitalist industry. Marxism calls for a world wide revolution to take place in order for a communist society to work.
This seems very unlikely. Also marx only set the stage for the revolution he left very policies about how society should work after the revolution was successful.

Finally in all the places where communism has been imposed there hasn't been a true communist society.In a true communist society there would be no leader at all. The people would make all the descisions.

3/21/2006 08:14:48 AM  
Anonymous said...

Tara, you praise the values of Canadian socialism in terms of benefits versus taxes paid, as compared to California. But it would be interesting to see how Canadian citizens would fare, if they had to fund their own defense instead of relying upon the US to protect the North American continent (paid for by US taxpayers.)

R: your comment that "Hitler wasn't a Socialist"...are you not aware that Hitler's polical party was the National Socialist German Worker's Party.

3/21/2006 01:31:57 PM  
Anonymous said...

I think a few folks are taking you a bit too literally on the Marxist thing. I totally get your Pinko Marketing Manifesto. Maybe I think the people nodding their heads just aren't commenting. BTW, many of the folks in the sixties that gave rise to the personal computer revolution actually WERE Marxists. I wrote about it again on my blog today. p.s. Yes, my parents are Cuban, but I'm not Marxist or Communist by any means. Capitalism is about creative destruction and reinvention - some capitalists just forget that when they're in comfy comfort zones and about to be disrupted.

I'll be at Wine Camp!

Evelyn Rodriguez
http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com

3/21/2006 03:21:55 PM  
Russell said...

Hitler was the head of the National Socialist party, and ... you think he wasn't a socialist?

3/24/2006 01:16:37 AM  
ReasonInRevolt said...

Very fun post. The big capitalist IT companies are all aghast at the prospect of web 2.0 and open source.

As for Hilter being a socialist, it is well known that he was, in fact, a fascist.

Finally, if we are in a "mass murder" contest, why not put GW Bush on the list?

3/24/2006 06:19:07 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home